Посты с тэгом: creativity

Can you learn to be more creative?

Published date: December 14, 2015 в 10:10 am

Written by:

Category: Uncategorized

Tags: ,,,

by Todd Bookman (with permission)
First, a definition.
“So my definition would be, in order for a certain idea to be creative, it must possess two major components. One, it has to be new, novel, something we haven’t seen before,” says Rom Schrift, a marketing professor at the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania.
“But it also has to be useful. So, if it is just something new, but doesn’t offer any benefit, it is not necessarily a creative idea.”
This semester, nearly 300 students are learning how to crank out more creative ideas in Schrift’s class titled “Creativity: Idea Generation & the Systematic Approach for Creativity.” It’s part of a growing field that treats problem solving as an academic discipline, complete with competing theories for what approaches produce the best results.
A page from Dr. Seuss
During lectures, Schrift bounces around the classroom, white sleeves rolled, preaching the gospel of creative thought. But if you think his mantra is as simple as ‘think outside the box,’ it turns out it is the exact opposite.
“The problem with this phrase is that, in most situations, we don’t know what the box is,” says Schrift. “What is the box? If we cannot define the box, how can we think outside of the box?”
According to Schrift, the core of learning to be creative is recognizing what the box actually is. What are the components and structures that make up the problem you are trying to solve, and what tools or attributes are at your disposal? Knowing what these constraints are, he argues, makes it easier to produce creative solutions.
“Actually inside the box, there are a lot of opportunities, and most of the creative ideas, if anything, they come from inside the box.”
Schrift uses an example from none other than Dr. Seuss to make his point.
“Dr. Seuss and a friend had a discussion about the shortcomings of using books to teach first graders how to read. And so his friend gave him a bet,” he says.
The challenge was simple: there were 350 unique words that first graders were expected to understand, and Seuss was to write a book using just 225 of them, and nothing more. Those, says Schrift, are his constraints.
“He used these constraints, right? He could not use any words, but there was a specific bank of words, and he came up with The Cat in a Hat.
“His publishers saw this, they said, interesting…let’s have another bet, another challenge, and he challenged Dr. Seuss to write another book using only 50 words, and he wrote Green Eggs and Ham.”
“You could argue, sure, Dr. Seuss is an extremely creative individual, and I agree, but there is something about imposing these constraints that maybe helped him be more creative. And this is kind of the approach we are teaching.”
Creativity on demand
Schrift’s class isn’t exactly Wharton’s version of “Rocks for Jocks.” During the semester, students learn different methods for approaching creativity with head scratching titles such as “The Attribute Dependency Template” and the “Task Unification and Closure Principle.” There’s a hefty reading list, as well as a major group project where students take on a real-world problem in partnership with a major company.
“I think I’m definitely more creative than I was before because I just can just think about it in a different way,” says Nicole Granet, a senior majoring in management. “I don’t feel like I need to just close my eyes, listen to some relaxing music, maybe something will come to me. I feel like I’m much more in control of being able to produce these ideas that can really make a big change…sort of be ‘creative on demand.'”
Granet is starting a job in consulting after she graduates, where, ideally, she’ll help companies be more productive, and creativity ‘on demand’ will definitely be an asset.
Gerard Puccio hears from employers all the time about how much they value that type of skillset. Puccio directs Buffalo State’s International Center for Studies in Creativity, which, in the late 1960s, became the first school in the country to offer classes on the subject.
He says the discipline has evolved over the years as the challenges we face have become more complex.
“Life has become much more complicated, and as a result, we need to enhance the level of complexity of our own thinking, to be able to deal better with complex problems…problems that don’t have easy answers,” says Puccio.
He adds that many of these creative skills are actually innate, and perhaps just need a little coaxing.
“It is a human characteristic. It is the reason why we’ve survived through the millennia. It is because…our competitive advantage is creative thinking. We are not the fastest, we can’t fly, we don’t naturally camouflage ourselves, we can only exist in certain climates. So, the human species has evolved to be creative, and in fact, that’s what has helped us to sustain ourselves over time,” says Puccio.
Design it out
Some of us, of course, are still going to be more creative than others.
Example #1: David Ludwig.
He’s a celebrated classical composer and a member of the composition faculty at Philadelphia’s Curtis Institute of Music, one of the nation’s top schools. He’s the type of guy who gets inspiration for melodies walking around the grocery store. But even with all of his innate ability, Ludwig is completely on board with the idea that creativity can be thought of as a skill to hone, and that understanding constraints and attributes is crucial to creating something new and useful.
“We start out very often with a commission,” he says, “and what I do is, I start making my own constraints. What is the piece about? What motivates it? Why is it meaningful? Then we go from there. We start with the biggest questions first, and go to the smallest.”
Ludwig says he often gets his students thinking about how best to approach creation of a new work by using a simple exercise.
“If I gave you an assignment and said draw a house…on a piece of paper. The first thing you would do, the first thing anyone has ever done when I’ve asked them to do that, is they start with the box and the roof. The frame. Always the frame. No one starts with the window and the TV in the living room in the background. No one starts with the little chimney with the smoke coming out of it.
“That is [an] unhindered, creative act. An unconscious creative act and we naturally put limitations on ourselves.”
Or, put another way, “We can’t order everything on the menu when we really create something. We have to really design it out.”
But what about just letting your mind wonder? Everyone can point to those random Eureka! moments, either in their work or personal life, when greatness strikes without any effort.
Professor Schrift says he does occasionally get pushback from people who argue the best ideas come when they aren’t pressing for one.
“If for some people, jumping on the trampoline and listening to strange music works? Keep doing that,” he says with a laugh. “But having said that, we offer another tool. We can’t always take a passive approach and wait for us to get this ‘aha moment’ in the shower.”
 
This interview first aired on WHYY’S The Pulse.
 

Good Business Is the Best Art

Published date: December 1, 2015 в 3:00 am

Written by:

Category: Uncategorized

Tags: ,,,,

“Being good in business is the most fascinating kind of art. Making money is art and working is art and good business is the best art.”

                           —Andy Warhol

Recognizing that business is an art form and that you, as a businessperson, are an artist is critical to surviving and thriving in the sharing economy. Leading brands must see themselves as artists of business first and agents of commerce second.
Art today is the ultimate vehicle for transforming a common commodity into a sought-after treasure. Why? Because art transforms something that was once utilitarian into a vessel of engagement, like Warhol did for the Campbell’s soup can.
Being an artist of business involves taking a product and turning it into an experience that engages the consumer and makes them a fan and loyalist for life because they are drawn to the product and to the emotions the product evokes. Try thinking about your products and services from an artistic point of view. What feelings do you want to evoke in your consumers? What feelings do you not want to illicit? Understand the creative and emotional impact of everything you do when it comes to your brand and learn how to create experiences, messages, stories, systems, services, and products that express the essence of that artistic vision.
How PepsiCo Turned a Bag of Chips into a Work of Art
PepsiCo demonstrated Warhol-inspired artistry with their Do Us a Flavor campaign, which invited customers to submit their ideas for a new potato chip flavor. The campaign is a great example of business art that turned their product, a bag of potato chips, into a canvas for global creative self-expression. This disruptively creative platform put potato chips front and center on the global stage by engaging the world in a co-creative process to artistically imagine a new generation of snack food, custom created by the public and Pepsi.
As the contest was global, an amazing array of exotic and unusual flavor combinations—from chicken and waffle to onion Lakshmi to Fluffernutter to pumpkin blood—were submitted to a panel of judges, who chose finalists from each country and ultimately a winner. The winner received $1 million and got their picture on their bag of chips.
The Do Us a Flavor campaign generated over 3.8 million submissions, and sales of the original chips, as well as sales of finalist chips, went through the roof. The campaign provided a ready and ever-renewing source of engaging content for the company’s website and YouTube channels.
The Do Us a Flavor campaign illustrates that today, people don’t just want to consume a product; they want to engage in the artistic endeavors brands can provide. And perhaps more important, this campaign demonstrates that creative experiences are what will influence purchasing decisions going forward, just as much as the quality of the product itself.
Interact and Connect
Warhol lived and worked in constant connection with others. The Factory was designed to be an environment that had all manner of people constantly connecting in new and unusual ways. This was the inspiration for Warhol’s art, and one of the reasons that he became more than a painter and grew into a movement that still has relevance today. In many ways, Warhol and his business model presaged the era of connectivity that we live in today through technology. So modern-day artists of business can learn a lot from Warhol’s approach to sharing.
The number one priority for brands today should be to create for the we and not for the me. While that is counterintuitive to traditional business strategy, as consumption is an individual activity, brands that embrace we-ness and build community are the ones that will ultimately win at the increasingly competitive global game of instigating consumer participation.
Why WeWork Works So Well
WeWork is a contemporary embodiment of the principles that drove Warhol’s Factory. WeWork bills itself as a community of creators, and has created work spaces nationwide designed to house the entrepreneurs, small business owners and artists of tomorrow, wherever they might live and work. WeWork is a business studio environment that appeals to innovators, mavericks, and artists who have left the constraints of corporate America behind and set off in pursuit of their own business missions with an eye toward building a better future.
Beyond office space, WeWork offers collaborative environments where innovators of all varieties can connect and share, resulting in countless mini incubators of business artistry. WeWork offers a panoply of services designed to instill and instigate creativity within its community. Amenities range from physical offerings like shared office space; conference rooms, and networking opportunities to creativity festivals such as sleep-away camp retreats imagined to facilitate collaborative imagination and innovation.
 
Adapted from We-Commerce: How to Create, Collaborate, and Succeed in the Sharing Economy by Billee Howard. © 2015 by Billee Howard. Tarcher Perigee, an imprint of Penguin Random House LLC.
 
Billee Howard is the author of WE-COMMERCE: How to Create, Collaborate, and Succeed in the Sharing Economy (Perigee Books, Penguin Random House). Howard is based in New York and is founder and chief engagement officer of Brandthropologie, and president of Mojo Risin Studios. She has been guiding companies to produce, envision, innovate, and create passionate dialogues and has had the privilege of working with many great leaders and brands including Jeffrey Katzenberg, Dreamworks Animation, Faith Popcorn, PepsiCo, Samsung, FastCompany, Boeing, Warby Parker among others. Howard was the winner of PR Week’s 30 under 30, and 40 under 40, as well as being selected for the Media Professional of the Year Award twice.
 

Yes, There is Such a Thing as an Ugly Baby

Published date: November 23, 2015 в 12:48 pm

Written by:

Category: Uncategorized

Tags: ,,

Imagine you’re working on a new initiative, and you come up with a great idea. You do some research on it, and you find some really good evidence to support your point-of-view. You think to yourself, “The team is going to love this.” So you go to your boss to pitch the idea.
But the boss seems skeptical. So she asks you to go out and do a some more research on it. You’re convinced this is a winner, so you go out and get a lot more data to support your case.
Along the way, you run across a few things that suggest that maybe it’s not such a great idea. But you ignore it because there is so much data in favor of your idea. You rationalize the negative information to minimize it – perhaps the source is not credible, or their situation was different. You just don’t much much value in it.
You go back to your boss and present all the positive evidence. You either leave out or barely mention the negative data that goes against your argument. And in doing so, you have just committed a cognitive error that can lead to poor judgments – The Confirmation Bias.
Confirmation bias is the tendency for people to only seek out information that conforms to their pre-existing viewpoints, and subsequently ignore information that goes against them. You overweight the good news, and underweight the bad news.
In some cases, you look for information to justify the decision you are already planning to make. This happens a lot in job interviews. Imagine you’re interviewing a candidate for a job. You think the candidate is a good fit, so you ask questions that allow the candidate to present himself in a positive light. If you know you won’t hire the candidate, you tend to ask questions that force the candidate to focus on his or her deficiencies. That is confirmation bias, and most of the time, you’re not even aware that you are doing it.
You would think that the availability of mountains of information could protect you from the confirmation bias. The problem is there is so much information that we have to make choices. We have a strong tendency to select according to what we believe.
It’s not hard to see why confirmation bias can lead to bad decisions. If we don’t gather a fair balance of information, we don’t give ourselves a complete and objective view of the situation. You increase the chances of being wrong.
By the way, when you share all the evidence with your, positive and negative, it actually strengthens, not weakens your case.
Confirmation bias is something all humans have. But just being aware of it isn’t good enough to prevent you from it. You can’t get rid of it, but there are things you can do to mitigate its effects and make better judgments.
To avoid confirmation bias, keep these pointers in mind:

  • List out the reasons that support your case. Then, imagine each one of them is wrong. Ask, how would it affect your decision. Take your strongest arguments and go find evidence that disproves them.
  • Get help from colleagues in finding evidence. Ask one colleague to find only positive evidence. Ask another colleague to find only negative evidence. This will help give you balance.
  • Find someone to act as a “dissenting voice of reason.” Present all the evidence you have and let them challenge you. That way you’ll be confronted with a contrary viewpoint to examine.
  • Frame opportunities in a way that forces you to find ways of disproving your hypothesis. Instead of saying, “let’s find reasons why this initiative will work,” frame it this way: “Let’s find reasons why this initiative won’t work.”

 
 

Thinking Creatively: How Deadlines Encourage Inside-the-Box Ideas

Published date: September 8, 2015 в 9:57 am

Written by:

Category: Uncategorized

Tags: ,,,,

Taylor Mallory Holland at Content Standard wrote this insightful article how tight deadlines can have both a positive and a negative affect on creativity.
From her article:

Dr. Richard Boyatzis, a professor of organizational behavior, psychology and cognitive science, explained his team’s findings to The Wall Street Journal:
The research shows us that the more stressful a deadline is, the less open you are to other ways of approaching the problem. The very moments when in organizations we want people to think outside the box, they can’t even see the box.

Taylor offers the following advice on how find the right balance:

Ditching deadlines isn’t the answer, nor is sacrificing quality for the sake of speed. But how do we find a happy medium?
For leaders in creative fields, the lesson here is to set flexible deadlines whenever possible—to leave some wiggle room in case good ideas take longer than planned. Consider breaking large projects into smaller tasks with their own deadlines. This not only prevents last-minute stress and overwhelm for workers; it also gives you good opportunities to check in and to offer support and feedback.
As Laura Vanderkam points out in her Fast Company article, it also helps to know your team members and set expectations for individuals. She says that while some people are good at meeting deadlines, “Others need more hand-holding and frequent check-ins. They’re not bad people, they’re just different people. Good management means getting to know the people you’re working with, and using deadlines as one tool in your kit for getting good work out of them in a timely fashion.”
While an understanding and flexible boss is certainly an asset for creative workers, individuals must also take responsibility for getting the job done—for thinking as creatively and as quickly as possible. This requires commitment and proper planning so we can give ourselves the time we need, rather than rushing at the last minute and stressing ourselves to the point of writer’s block. It also means learning how to get in the “creative thinking” zone when we need to be productive, not just when the moment strikes.
For scientifically-proven ways to be innovative and efficient, read “7 Productivity Tips to Boost Creativity on a Deadline.”
 
 

Innovation in Practice: Seven Years Strong

Published date: December 22, 2014 в 1:48 pm

Written by:

Category: Uncategorized

Tags: ,,,

This month marks the seven year anniversary of Innovation in Practice. As always, I want to thank my many readers and supporters who follow it.
2014 was an excellent year as our message about systematic creativity continues to be heard. Jacob Goldenberg and I launched our book, Inside the Box: A Proven System of Creativity for Breakthrough Results last year, and it was nominated for Innovation Book of the Year. We’re thrilled that the book is now published in fourteen languages. It is the first detailed description of Systematic Inventive Thinking (the method and the people at SIT LLC that taught it to me.)
Teaching, writing, and speaking continue to be my main focus. Professor Jim Tappel and I co-taught a Massive Open Online Course (MOOC) at the University of Cincinnati called Innovation and Design Thinking. I’ve published more courses at Lynda.com on innovation, marketing, and branding. I continue to write articles on creativity for Psychology Today, Industry Week, and Coca-Cola Journey. Staying busy is a good thing.
My goal is to make this blog different from other innovation blogs and websites. Instead of focusing on why innovation is important, I focus on how innovation happens.  The themes of this blog are:

  • Innovation can be learned like any other skill such as marketing, leadership, or playing the guitar.  To be an innovator, learn a method.Teach it to others.
  • Innovation must be linked to strategy. Innovation for innovation’s sake doesn’t matter. Innovation that is guided by strategy or helps guide strategy yields the most opportunity for corporate growth.
  • Innovation is a two-way phenomena. We can start with a problem and innovate solutions. Or we can generate hypothetical solutions and explore problems that they solve. To be a great innovator, you need to be a two-way innovator.
  • The corporate perspective, where innovation is practiced day-to-day, is what must be understood and kept at the center of attention. This is where truth is separated from hype.

2015 will be an explosive year in terms of more keynotes, workshops, and training programs. I plan to collaborate with my various business partners and colleagues at the University on making SIT the dominant form of ideation. Since learning it in 2002, I’ve not found anything that surpasses it. Both Jacob and I are “open source” in terms of helping anyone who wants to learn or teach the method. Our slides, Syllabi, and training materials are available to all. Just ask.
I want to thank Jacob, as well as Amnon Levav, Yoni Stern, and the entire team at SIT LLC. I thank Marta Dapena-Baron at Big Picture Partners, Bob Cialdini and the team at Influence at Work, Yury Boshyk at Global Executive Learning, the Washington Speakers Bureau, the team at Lynda.com, Jim Levine, Emilie D’Agostino, Shelley Bamburger, the team at Innovation Excellence (Braden, Julie, Rowan), and my fellow faculty at the UC Lindner College of Business.
Special thanks to my family, Wendy and Ryan, for all their love and support.
 
Drew

Teaching Creativity With a Story: A Lesson From Paul Smith

Published date: November 10, 2014 в 3:00 am

Written by:

Category: Uncategorized

Tags: ,,,,

Creativity is considered by many to be a rare, elusive gift only musicians or bohemian New York artists possess. And to be sure, some people are born with more than an average amount of it. But everyone has the capacity to be creative. Many of us simply don’t call on it very often. When you intentionally call on that capacity inside, really call for it, you’ll realize it can be summoned. That’s a lesson Michael Margolis learned at an early age.
Michael grew up in Lausanne, a city in western Switzerland perched on the north shore of Lake Geneva. He describes his father as “a mad scientist and inventor.” His mother, Leslie, was a teacher, artist, and toy designer. “So I never knew if my day was going to be an art project or a science experiment,” he muses. Importantly, Michael recalls climbing in the family station wagon on many weekends and driving around to rummage sales. “What everyone else was getting rid of, we would buy.” They referred to other people’s trash as “super-junk, because we would build things with it.” As a result, their basement was always well stocked with super-junk.
When Michael was six years old, he remembers his older brother David working on an art project at home with some clever material their mom had given him. And, as can happen between siblings, Michael got jealous. “Why does David always get the cool stuff? That’s not fair!” Most such squabbles were tame enough. But for whatever reason, this time Michael was hysterical over it. “I threw a complete tantrum. I was kicking and screaming and huffing and puffing.”
Mom quickly intervened. “Michael, Michael, take a breath, son. Just wait here. I’ll be right back.” She soon emerged from the basement with something in her hands. Michael was still upset and sniffling, so Mom had to work to get his attention.
“Michael, look here, son. Look at this. I have something for you.” And she handed him an old wooden box.
Michael didn’t know it at the time, but what she handed him was an old sewing box, part of her collection of super-junk. And it was no longer in any shape to serve as a sewing box. One of the covers was missing. It was badly chipped on another side. And the hinges were rusty. But she got him to at least look at it. He quickly noticed that this box didn’t open from the top like most boxes. It opened from the sides, with nested layers of trays that splayed out like a fishing tackle box the further you pulled them. And then she asked Michael the critical question. She said, “Michael, what do you see?”
Still sniffling and cranky, all Michael could come back with was, “I don’t know what you’re talking about, Mom. It’s just a box!”
Undaunted, Mom repeated slowly, “Michael, what do you see?”
So Michael calmed himself and finally took a good look at the box for a moment. And then another moment. And then finally, with a bolt of excitement and discovery, he shouted, “Oh, it’s a pirate ship!”
“Well done, Michael,” Mom said with a smile. “Now let’s go build it.”
And with that the two struck off to the basement for more supplies. They found some old empty shotgun shells that became cannons for the deck. An old wooden centipede toy held together with springs sacrificed its legs, each of which became a crew member on board the ship. Then Leslie dug into a cupboard full of old wedding gifts and mementos and  pulled out a set of doily napkins that had never seen use. When she presented them to Michael, he beamed, “Hey, you found sails!”
By the time they were done, it was a beautiful piece of art and a finely functioning pirate ship Michael is still proud of today.
Michael took away two lessons from that day. First, the joy of reinvention and reinterpretation: “How you can take things that are old and discarded and remake them in a new way.” And second, he learned to see possibilities where none readily appear, like seeing a pirate ship in an old sewing box.
For our purposes here, however, what’s important is the brilliant way Michael’s mother taught him to summon that creativity. She did it by asking him the simple question, “Michael, what do you see?” And she didn’t let up until he’d given her an answer. It wasn’t simply a question. It was an invitation to use his imagination.
If you want to summon creativity—in your young person or in yourself— try following Leslie Margolis’s lead. Look at your subject, and ask the question, “What do you see?”
(To our regular readers, you should recogize that last question to be the same as the Principle of Function Follows Form, a part of the SIT innovation method. Special thanks to Paul Smith for sharing this excerpt from his new book).
=======================
Adapted from PARENTING WITH A STORY: Real-Life Lessons in Character for Parents and Children to Share by Paul Smith (AMACOM; November 2014; $16.00 Paperback; 978-0-8144-3357-7).
Paul Smith is a bestselling author who’s newest book, Parenting with a Story, documents 101 inspiring lessons like this one to help you, and your kids, build the kind of character anyone would be proud of. He’s a former director of consumer research and 20-year-veteran of The Procter & Gamble Company. Today he is a corporate trainer on leadership through storytelling based on his bestselling book Lead with a Story: A Guide to Crafting Business Narratives that Captivate, Convince, and Inspire. You can find Paul at www.leadwithastory.com and on Twitter as @LeadWithAStory.
 

Decluttering Innovation

Published date: August 11, 2014 в 1:28 pm

Written by:

Category: Uncategorized

Tags: ,,,,

People need time to innovate, but corporations tend to “tax” employees with time-wasting bureaucracy. As reported in The Economist, clutter is taking a toll on both morale and productivity.

“Teresa Amabile of Harvard Business School studied the daily routines of more than 230 people who work on projects that require creativity. As might have been expected, she found that their ability to think creatively fell markedly if their working days were punctuated with meetings. They did far better if left to focus on their projects without interruption for a large chunk of the day, and had to collaborate with no more than one colleague.”

Endless meetings aren’t the only forms of corporate clutter. Complex organizational design forces people to waste valuable time and energy figuring out how to get things done. Emails overload, especially when employees don’t know how to use filtering techniques. Status reports dull the mind and waste energy by forcing employees to regurgitate old news

To fight through the clutter, I recommend the following:

1. Develop an Innovation Competency: Innovation is a skill, not a gift.  It can be learned by anyone and applied systematic. Innovative companies treat it as just another core skill by creating a well-defined set of innovation competencies and embedding them into employee’s competency model along with other required behaviors such as ethics and leadership.  A innovation method such as SIT, for example, gives an employee the ability to “innovate on demand.”

2. Drive Innovation as a Process: Defining innovation as just the NPD process is too limiting. Leaders need to sponsor cross-functional teams using systematic innovation tools that feed concepts into the NPD process.  This will eliminate the “fuzzy” in the front end to create sustainable process of generating new opportunities.

3. Innovate Under the Radar: In the Harvard Business Review, Paddy Miller and Thomas Wedell-Wedellsborg make a great point in their article, “The Case for Stealth Innovation.”  Savvy innovators know how to operate under the radar and nurture innovation programs through complex bureaucracy.  Thomas Bonoma’s classic HBR article from 1986, “Marketing Subversives,”said something similar:

“I found that under conditions of marketplace change, success depended heavily on the presence of marketing subversives in a company.  Subversive marketers undermined their organizations’ structures to implement new marketing practices….And no matter what higher management had decided to allocate to various marketing projects, the subversives found ways to work around the official budget.  They bootlegged the resources they needed to implement new, more appropriate marketing practices.”

The same can be said about innovation.

Copyright 2014 Drew Boyd

Inside versus Outside: The Story of the Inside the Box

Published date: April 20, 2014 в 5:25 am

Written by:

Category: Uncategorized

Tags: ,,,,,

Go behind the scenes of “Inside the Box: A Proven System of Creativity for Breakthrough Results”  with co-author, Drew Boyd, who shares insights about the writing of the book and its impact on the creative potential of organizations.

The book has been or will soon be published in the following languages: English/US, English/UK Commonwealth, Dutch, Spanish, Korean, Chinese, Japanese, Hebrew, Portuguese, Thai, Russian, German, and Turkish. See all book jacket versions here: http://www.pinterest.com/drewboyd/inside-the-box/.
 

The Creativity Method of The Beatles

Published date: February 10, 2014 в 3:00 am

Written by:

Category: Uncategorized

Tags: ,,,

“As usual, for these co-written things, John often had just the first verse, which was always enough:  it was the direction, it was the signpost and it was the inspiration for the whole song.  I hate the word but it was the template.”  –  Paul McCartney
Fifty years ago on Feb. 9, 1964, the Beatles made their first appearance on “The Ed Sullivan Show.” A record 73 million people watched that night. And the rest, of course, is history.

The Beatles were innovators, and they did it systematically using templates. The Beatles were corporate innovators who created immense fortunes for their shareholders. They used structured methods, experimentation, and technology the same way Fortune 500 companies create new products and services.

According to the Recording Industry Association of America, The Beatles have sold more albums in the United States than any other artist. In 2004, Rolling Stone magazine ranked them number one in its list of 100 Greatest Artists of All Time, and four of their albums appeared in the top ten of the magazine’s 500 Greatest Albums of All Time list. The Beatles’ innovative music and cultural impact helped define the 1960s, and their influence on pop culture is still evident today. The Beatles were collectively included in Time magazine’s list of The Most Important People of the 20th Century. 

How were they so effective?

The Beatles practiced team innovation. John Lennon and Paul McCartney are the most successful musical collaboration in history. One would sketch an idea or a song fragment and take it to the other to finish or improve; in some cases, two incomplete songs or song ideas that each had worked on individually would be combined into a complete song. Often one of the pair would add a middle eight or bridge section to the other’s verse and chorus. Lennon called it “Writing eyeball-to-eyeball” and “Playing into each other’s noses”. They applied these templates in a disciplined, structured way to create a stream of hit songs.

The Beatles were experimenters.  David Thurmaier writes:

Above all, the Beatles remained curious about all types of music, and they continually reinvented their own music by injecting it with fresh influences from multiple cultures. This experimentation adds a dimension to their work that separates it from their contemporaries’ music. In the second volume of his book The Beatles as Musicians, Walter Everett explains that “rock musicians’ interest in Indian sounds multiplied rapidly” after George Harrison introduced the Indian sitar to the song “Norwegian Wood (This Bird Has Flown).” Also, the string quartet on 1965’s “Yesterday” would make its way into the music of other groups around the same time. This exchange of musical innovations worked both ways; for example, the Beatles were able to take elements from Bob Dylan’s music and meld them into their own. Their relentless experimentation and questing for the “new” is one strong element that makes the Beatles’ music attractive and rewarding for study and enjoyment.

The Beatles loved technology. They innovated songs and the way they produced songs. They used a wide range of techniques in the studio to differentiate their sound including guitar feedback, classical musicians on popular albums, artificial double tracking, close miking of acoustic instruments, sampling, direct injection, synchronizing tape machines, and backwards tapes. The recording process was summed up by Paul McCartney: “We would say, ‘Try it. Just try it for us. If it sounds crappy, OK, we’ll lose it. But it might just sound good.’ We were always pushing ahead: louder, further, longer, more, different.”

Oddly, McCartney seemed uncomfortable using templates to write songs.  Perhaps using a template seemed like cheating, making him feel less creative. This is a fallacy about creativity and creative people. My sense is that creative people in any field use a template of some sort. How could creative people like Robert Frost, Shakespeare, da Vinci, and Disney continue to pour out masterful work over and over? Like the Beatles, they used templates. It gave them the direction, the signpost, and the inspiration to apply their creative mind in a structured, systematic way.

Many have studied and commented on the contributions of The Beatles and the lessons learned. And in the end, it was their prolific use of structured innovation templates that made their contributions possible.

Bloomberg Business Week: Inside the Box

Published date: August 19, 2013 в 8:56 am

Written by:

Category: Uncategorized

Tags: ,,,,

Most people think innovation starts with a well-defined problem, and then you brainstorm a solution. Try the opposite: Work backwards by taking an abstract, conceptual solution and finding a problem it can solve. By constraining and channeling our brains, we can make them work both harder and smarter to find creative solutions—on demand.
Start by taking a product, concept, situation, service, or process and break it into components or attributes. Using one of the five techniques below, manipulate the components or attributes to create new concepts.
Subtraction: Remove a component, preferably an essential one. Royal Phillips Electronics (PHG) created the Slimline DVD player by removing the LCD panel and controls and placing them on the screen of the attached TV, allowing the unit to be shrunk dramatically.
Division: Divide a component or the product itself physically or functionally, then rearrange it. Google (GOOG) Circles was devised as a way to divide your friends into relevant groups, such as college friends, family, neighbors, and co-workers.
Task Unification: Assign a component an additional job, perhaps stealing the job of something around it. Samsonite made a college backpack with straps that also massage. The straps press into the wearer’s shoulders at strategically located shiatsu points to provide a soothing massage sensation. The heavier the books, the deeper the sensation and the more stress relief for the wearer.
Multiplication: Make a copy of a component, then change it in a significant way from the original. Procter & Gamble (PG) came up with the NOTICEable Air Fresher by doubling its spray capacity. The air freshner has two different scented sprays that pulse in a sequence, so your nose does not get used to one fragrance.
Attribute Dependency: Create a correlation (or break an existing one) between two attributes of the system and/or its environment. Apple (AAPL) has patented “smart shoes” that have embedded sensors to track your activity and tell you when you need a new pair. As the shoes wear down, an app will send a signal to buy new ones.
Creativity is not a gift that you either have or don’t have from birth. It is a skill that can be learned and mastered by anyone. In that way, creativity is not that different from other skills: The more you practice, the better you’ll be.
 
This article first appeared in Bloomberg Business Week blog August 12, 2013
 

Get our innovation model that has worked for 1000+ companies.

    No thanks, not now.